Acute Skin Toxicity-Related, Out-of-Pocket Expenses in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy

Schnur, J, J Graff Zivin, D Mattson, S Green, L Jandorf, AG Wernicke, and G Montgomery, “Acute Skin Toxicity-Related, Out-of-Pocket Expenses in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy” Supportive Care Cancer, 20(2012): 3105-3113.

Download PDF

Purpose Acute skin toxicity is one of the most common side effects of breast cancer radiotherapy. To date, no one has estimated the nonmedical out-of-pocket expenses associated with this side effect. The primary aim of the present descriptive, exploratory study was to assess the feasibility of a newly developed skin toxicity costs questionnaire. The secondary aims were to: (1) estimate nonmedical out-of pocket costs, (2) examine the nature of the costs, (3) explore potential background predictors of costs, and (4) explore the relationship between patient-reported dermatologic quality of life and expenditures. Methods A total of 50 patients (mean age054.88, Stage 0– III) undergoing external beam radiotherapy completed a demographics/medical history questionnaire as well as a seven-item Skin Toxicity Costs (STC) questionnaire and the Skindex-16 in week 5 of treatment. Results Mean skin toxicity costs were $131.64 (standard error [SE]0$23.68). Most frequently incurred expenditures were new undergarments and products to manage toxicity. Education was a significant unique predictor of spending, with more educated women spending more money. Greater functioning impairment was associated with greater costs. The STC proved to be a practical, brief measure which successfully indicated specific areas of patient expenditures and need. Conclusions Results reveal the nonmedical, out-of-pocket costs associated with acute skin toxicity in the context of breast cancer radiotherapy. To our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify individual costs associated with this treatment side effect, as well as the first to present a scale specifically designed to assess such costs. Relevance In future research, the STC could be used as an outcome variable in skin toxicity prevention and control research, as a behavioral indicator of symptom burden, or as part of a needs assessment.

Previous
Previous

Environmental Policy and Political Realities: Fisheries Management & Job Creation in the Pacific Islands

Next
Next

The Intended and Unintended Effects of U.S. Agricultural and Biotechnology Policies